Case 88

Type B Aortic Dissection

 

Question

What do these scans show?

00.jpeg 01.jpeg 02.jpeg
03.jpeg 04.jpeg 05.jpeg
06.jpeg 07.jpeg 08.jpeg
09.jpeg 10.jpeg 11.jpeg
12.jpeg 13.jpeg 14.jpeg
15.jpeg 16.jpeg 17.jpeg
18.jpeg 19.jpeg 20.jpeg
21.jpeg 22.jpeg 23.jpeg
24.jpeg 25.jpeg 26.jpeg
27.jpeg 28.jpeg 29.jpeg
30.jpeg 31.jpeg 32.jpeg
33.jpeg 34.jpeg 35.jpeg
36.jpeg 37.jpeg 38.jpeg
39.jpeg 40.jpeg 41.jpeg
42.jpeg 43.jpeg 44.jpeg
45.jpeg 46.jpeg 47.jpeg
48.jpeg 49.jpeg 50.jpeg
51.jpeg 52.jpeg 53.jpeg
54.jpeg 55.jpeg 56.jpeg
57.jpeg 58.jpeg 59.jpeg
60.jpeg 61.jpeg 62.jpeg
63.jpeg 64.jpeg 65.jpeg
66.jpeg 67.jpeg 68.jpeg
69.jpeg 70.jpg

Answer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Answer

Aortic dissection, type B

 

Echocardiography of aortic dissection

 

Aortic Dissection

 

Background: Much has been written on the subject of aortic dissections, from the first well-documented case of aortic dissection, when King George II of England died while straining on the commode, to the first successful operative repairs by DeBakey in 1955, to modern techniques of diagnosing and repairing thoracic aortic dissections.

Aortic dissection is the most common catastrophe of the aorta, 2-3 times more common than rupture of the abdominal aorta. When left untreated, about 33% of patients die within the first 24 hours, and 50% die within 48 hours. The 2-week mortality rate approaches 75% in patients with undiagnosed ascending aortic dissection.

Dissections of the thoracic aorta have been classified anatomically by 2 different methods. The more commonly used system is the Stanford classification, which is based on involvement of the ascending aorta and simplifies the DeBakey classification.

The Stanford classification divides dissections into 2 types, type A and type B.

  • Type A involves the ascending aorta (DeBakey types I and II); type B does not (DeBakey type III).
  • This system also helps delineate treatment. Usually, type A dissections require surgery, while type B dissections may be managed medically under most conditions.
  • The DeBakey classification divides the dissections into 3 types.


  • Type I involves the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta.
  • Type II is confined to the ascending aorta.
  • Type III is confined to the descending aorta distal to the left subclavian artery.

     

  • Type III dissections are further divided into IIIa and IIIb.

     

  • Type IIIa refers to dissections that originate distal to the left subclavian artery but extend both proximally and distally, most above the diaphragm.

     

  • Type IIIb refers to dissections that originate distal to the left subclavian artery, extend only distally and may extend below the diaphragm.
  • Thoracic aortic dissections should be distinguished from aneurysms (localized abnormal dilation of the aorta) and transections, which are caused most commonly by high-energy trauma.

     

    Pathophysiology: The essential feature of aortic dissection is a tear in the intimal layer, followed by formation and propagation of a subintimal hematoma. The dissecting hematoma commonly occupies about half and occasionally the entire circumference of the aorta. This produces a false lumen or double-barreled aorta, which can reduce blood flow to the major arteries arising from the aorta. If the dissection involves the pericardial space, cardiac tamponade may result.

    Cystic medial necrosis

    The normal aorta contains collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle cells that contribute the intima, media, and adventitia to the layers of the aorta. With aging, degenerative changes lead to breakdown of the collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle and an increase in basophilic ground substance. This condition is termed cystic medial necrosis. Atherosclerosis that causes occlusion of the vasa vasorum also produces this disorder. Cystic medial necrosis is the hallmark histologic change associated with dissection in those with Marfan syndrome.

    Cystic medial necrosis was first described by Erdheim in 1929. Sources disagree over the accuracy of this term in the elderly, since the true histopathologic changes are neither cystic nor necrotic. Researchers have used the term cystic medial degeneration.

    Early on, cystic medial necrosis described an accumulation of basophilic ground substance in the media with the formation of cystlike pools. The media in these focal areas may show loss of cells (ie, necrosis). This term still is used commonly to describe the histopathologic changes that occur.

    Dissection sites

    The most common site of dissection is the first few centimeters of the ascending aorta, with 90% occurring within 10 centimeters of the aortic valve. The second most common site is just distal to the left subclavian artery. Between 5% and 10% of dissections do not have an obvious intimal tear. These often are attributed to rupture of the aortic vasa vasorum as first described by Krukenberg in 1920.

    Pathophysiology: The pathogenesis of the disease is not well understood but the following are associated risk factors:

     

     

    Frequency:

    Mortality/Morbidity:

    Race: Aortic dissection is more common in blacks than in whites and less common in Asians than in whites.

    Sex: Male-to-female ratio is 3:1.

    Age: Approximately 75% of dissections occur in those aged 40-70 years, with a peak in the range of 50-65 years.

     

    Clinical Details:

    Dissections of the aorta can be classified into types.

     

    Note that isolated dissections that begin in the aortic arch but do not involve the ascending aorta do not fit neatly into these classifications

    AIH is classified in a similar fashion

    Preferred Examination: Preferred examinations include contrast-enhanced spiral CT transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the emergency setting and MRI for hemodynamically stable patients. The ability of TEE to evaluate the status of the aortic valve and the ostia of the coronary arteries is an advantage over CT and MRI. CT and MR angiography has largely replaced conventional diagnostic angiography in the assessment of aortic dissection.

    Several factors determine the best modality for the initial evaluation as well as postoperative follow-up. These factors include the following: stability of the patient's condition, patient's renal function, suspected postoperative complication, and availability of each imaging modality.

    Limitations of Techniques: Three noninvasive studies are associated with high specificity and sensitivity. CT and MRI are associated with high sensitivity and specificity of 94-100% and 95-100%, respectively. TEE is less sensitive and specific than spiral CT or MR, and TEE is operator-dependent. In addition, due to tracheal interposition, there is a 2 cm "blind spot" for TEE just proximal to the innominate arteries. Also, approximately 1% of patients have a contraindication to TEE (eg, esophageal varices).

    Differential diagnosis

    Aortic Regurgitation 
    Aortic Stenosis 
    Back Pain, Mechanical 
    Gastroenteritis 
    Hernias 
    Hypertensive Emergencies 
    Myocardial Infarction 
    Myocarditis 
    Myopathies 
    Pancreatitis 
    Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade 
    Peripheral Vascular Injuries 
    Pleural Effusion 
    Pulmonary Embolism 
    Shock, Cardiogenic 
    Shock, Hemorrhagic 
    Shock, Hypovolemic 
    Thoracic Outlet Syndrome 



    Other Problems to be Considered: 

    Musculoskeletal chest pain

    Lab Studies:

    Blood studies

    Plain X-Ray

    Findings: Findings of aortic dissection on plain film images include the following

    All findings on plain images are nonspecific but may help in determining the need for further workup.

    False Positives/Negatives: Mediastinal fat can commonly cause a widened mediastinum and a false-positive diagnosis of aortic dissection

     

    CAT Scan

    Findings: Since its introduction in the 1970s, CT has become a widely used technology, particularly in the ED. With the advent of spiral CT, the studies can be performed in less time than before with less patient discomfort, greater accuracy, and lower iodine load. Spiral CT permits patient translation and data acquisition simultaneously. A major advantage of this technology is in the evaluation of thoracic trauma, which enables the rapid diagnosis of thoracic injury. Multislice or multidetector CT can be used for faster imaging or to acquire thinner slices that can be reconstructed in multiple planes

    A typical helical scanning protocol for aortic dissection includes the following parameters: 5-mm collimation, 1.5 pitch, and 7.5-mm imaging spacing. Multidetector CT can be performed with 1-2.5 mm collimation. Initial nonenhanced CT is used for the diagnosis of acute hemorrhage and aortic rupture. This is followed by helical CT performed approximately 25-30 seconds after the injection of contrast material. Nonionic contrast material (120-135 mL) is power injected via a peripheral intravenous site at a rate of 3-4 mL/s. Because cardiac output is quite variable in these sick patients, use a test injection of contrast to determine circulation time or an automated bolus detection scheme. One advantage of the test injection method is that one may visually differentiate the true and false lumen based on contrast arrival time.

    Usually, scanning is performed from the thoracic inlet to the common femoral arteries. When a dissection is identified, repeat scanning can be performed to obtain delayed images of the false lumen and aortic branches. Multiplanar reformation images are obtained in sagittal, coronal, oblique sagittal, and curved projections generated with an independent workstation. The use of volume rendering can be helpful for planning surgery

    Typical CT findings in acute dissection or intramural hematoma include the following:

     

    Hemorrhagic pleural and pericardial effusions and mediastinal hemorrhage may be seen.

    CT is also helpful in postoperative follow-up. It can accurately depict associated complications, including the following:

    Degree of Confidence: The sensitivity of CT is 87-94%, and the specificity is 92-100%.

    False Positives/Negatives: Inadequate contrast opacification can lead to false-negative findings. Aortic intramural hematoma can be misinterpreted as an aneurysm with thrombus or arteritis.

    Spiral CT artifacts include perivenous streaks and motion artifacts. The perivenous streaks are caused by beam hardening and motion due to transmitted pulsation in a vein that carries undiluted contrast medium into the heart. Some authors recommend injecting the contrast agent at a rate of 2 mL/s via a peripheral intravenous site in the right arm. Aortic motion artifact is produced by the aortic wall motion from the end of diastole to the end of systole. Typically, this artifact is seen in the left anterior and right posterior margins of the aortic circumference.

    In some patients, especially those with cystic medial necrosis, the intimal flap may be subtle.

     

    MRI

    Findings: MRI is an accurate tool for use in diagnosis but it may not be readily available in the acute setting. In addition, unstable patients with Swan-Ganz catheters should not be studied with MR.

    MRI findings of aortic dissection include the following:

     

    Newer pulse sequences such as True Fisp or Fiesta offer very fast cine imaging.

    Basic MRI sequences to evaluate for aortic dissection include spin-echo T1-weighted or breath-hold double inversion recovery sequences, cardiac-gated gradient-echo sequences, and three-dimensional (3D) thin-section MR angiography with a bolus injection of a single or double dose of gadolinium-based contrast agent

    MRI findings of AIH include a crescent of blood surrounding but not compressing the aorta. The signal intensity of the crescent varies with age on T1-weighted imaging: it is isointense to muscle in the acute setting and markedly hyperintense after 3-7 days.

    MRI is also helpful in postoperative follow-up. It can accurately depict associated complications, including the following:

    Degree of Confidence: The sensitivity and specificity are both more than 90%.

    False Positives/Negatives: Potential drawbacks of MRI include reported artifacts on cardiac-triggered thoracic spin-echo phase images. These can appear as an artifactual borderlike feature across the aorta (due to helical flow in the aorta) that can be interpreted as a dissection. Other potential causes of misinterpretation include an atypical configuration of the intimal flap seen in short dissections and multiple false channels where the flaps are complex. Aortic anomalies also can cause confusion. False positives seen in gadolinium-enhanced MRA include a central line or "maki" artifact. This occurs when the acquisition is performed too early as intraortic gadolinium concentration is rising. This artifact can be readily differentiated from an aortic dissection as it does not take a spiral course like a true intimal flap.

     

    Ultrasound

    Findings: ECG is helpful in the diagnosis of aortic dissections. It is particularly helpful with ascending thoracic dissections, cardiac tamponade, and aortic regurgitation where TEE has a greater sensitivity and specificity than CT or MR in detecting coronary arterial occlusion, aortic insufficiency, and cardiac tamponade. The sensitivity is 97-99%. The specificity is in the range of 97-100%.

    TEE was the favored study for the evaluation of aortic dissection according to a study by Mastrogiovanni et al from Salerno, Italy. In their report of 54 patients, TEE findings confirmed the diagnostic dissection in all patients but one. The site of the intimal tear; the extension of the dissection, pericardial effusion, aortic incompetence; and left ventricular function was noted. Because of the high level of correspondence between the diagnosis made at TEE and the surgical anatomic findings, the authors favor the use of TEE, often as the sole diagnostic modality.

    False Positives/Negatives: A tortuous aorta may result in a false-positive diagnosis of dissection. In massive dilated ascending aortas (usually due to cystic medial necrosis) it may be difficult to identify a small intimal flap.

     

    Angiography

    Findings: Aortography was the reference standard for the preoperative evaluation and diagnosis of aortic dissection. With the advent of TEE, CT, and MRI, its role has become important only if nonsurgical interventional procedures are indicated. It is quite controversial whether coronary angiography should be performed prior to sternotomy in a stable patient with aortic dissection, as concomitant coronary bypass grafting can be performed if diseased vessels are present.

    Diagnostic criteria include visualization of a lucent flap and delayed filling and washout of the false lumen. The expanding false lumen may compress the true lumen and cause it to become narrowed. A dual lumen aorta is noted when both the true and false lumens are opacified. AIH is almost impossible to diagnose with aortography as no compression of the lumen exists

    During aortography, overinjection of the false lumen should be avoided if it is entered during the procedure. The operator should be suspicious if he or she has difficulty advancing the guidewire into the aortic valve. Abdominal and pelvic aortography should be included in the diagnostic study to assess the level of the reentry site. Obstruction of the aortic branches may be noted (most commonly in the left renal artery in approximately 25-30% of patients). Visceral and extremity ischemia can occur when the superior or inferior mesenteric arteries and the iliac arteries are compromised.

    Degree of Confidence: Aortographic findings are less sensitive than those of newer noninvasive techniques, especially for aortic intramural hematoma.

    False Positives/Negatives: Pitfalls of angiography include a lack of visualization of the false lumen because of thrombosis or inadequate opacification with contrast material. Streak artifacts secondary to aortic or cardiac motion or opacification of the sinus of Valsalva can be confused with thrombus. Pitfalls also include missing the diagnosis of an intramural hematoma (frequently associated with progression to frank dissection) and misdiagnosis when the false lumen is thrombosed.

     

    Treatment

    Prehospital Care:

    Emergency Department Care:

    Consultations:

     

    Follow up

    Further Inpatient Care:

    Further Outpatient Care:

    Transfer:

    Prognosis:

     

    Medical/Legal Pitfalls: